Friday, March 31, 2017

Supreme Court of India takes a path breaking step by ordering installation of CCTV cameras in courts on experiment basis



A Bench of Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Justice UU Lalit on 28th March 2017 passed a path-breaking Order in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 99/2015 titled as "Pradyuman Bisht vs Union of India and others".  In this order, the Supreme Court directed the Government to install CCTV cameras in at least in two districts in every State/Union Territory inside the courts and at such important locations of the court complexes as may be considered appropriate. The Court directed that installation of these CCTV cameras be completed within three months and the report of such experiment be submitted within one month of such installation by the Registrar Generals of the respective High Courts to the Secretary General of Supreme Court who will have it tabulated and placed before the Court. THe matter was adjourned to 9th August, 2017 for further consideration.    .............



Here is the Text of the Order passed on 28th March 2017 :


"Heard. 
 In pursuance of order dated 6th February, 2017, Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General, and Mr. R. Venkatramani, learned senior advocate, who were appointed as amicus to assist the Court visited the Gurgaon Courts and have 2 submitted their respective written notes. 

                   We have gone through the written notes and also heard Mr. R. Venkatramani. 
                
                  We direct that at least in two districts in every State/Union Territory (with the exception of small States/Union Territories where it may be considered to be difficult to do so by the concerned High Courts) CCTV cameras (without audio recording) may be installed inside the courts and at such important locations of the court complexes as may be considered appropriate. Monitor thereof may be in the Chamber of the concerned District and Session Judge. Location of the district courts and any other issues concerning the subject may be decided by the respective High Courts. We make it clear that the footage of the CCTV camera will not be available under the R.T.I. and will not be supplied to anyone without permission of the concerned High Court. Installation may be completed within three months from today. 

                The report of such experiment be submitted within one month of such installation by the Registrar Generals of the respective High Courts to the Secretary General of this Court who may have it tabulated and placed before the Court. 

                 List on Wednesday, the 9th August, 2017 for further consideration."


However, concerns have been raised by certain quarters that the
following directives given in the order defeats its very purpose:
(a)CCTV video footage will be beyond the reach of RTI
(b)CCTV footage is not accompanied by audio recordings of the court proceedings.

It is reported that in November 2014, the e-Committee of the Supreme Court had rejected the Central Government’s proposal to introduce Audio Visual (AV) recording in subordinate courts as a part of the e-Courts project. Later in January 2015, a 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court dismissed a petition that proposed the installation of CCTV cameras in the court halls of the Supreme Court. Thereafter, in July 2015, the E-Committee did not consider the Central Government’s proposal to install AV recording systems in subordinate courts on the ground that the courts system in India has not reached the level where recording of court proceedings can be permitted. 

It would be interesting to see as to how the Hon’ble Apex Court deals with such concerns in further hearings…


Sunil Goel
Advocate