Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Supreme Court issues Contempt notice to sitting High Court Judge


In a first of its kind, the Supreme Court of India has issued Contempt notice to a sitting High Court Judge (Justice C.S.Karnan of Madras High Court) in suo moto proceedings. The notice has been issued in view of serious and reckless allegations by Justice C.S.Karnan against other Judges of the High Court and apparent defiance by Justice C.S.Karnan of the Supreme Court’s orders.
                                                                                                                        ....................


Supreme Court issued notice to him on 8th February 2017 to appear on 13.2.2017. However, Justice C.S.Karnan did not appear no any advocate appeared on his behalf on 13.2.2017. Under these circumstances, the Seven Judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court adjourned the matter and directed Justice C.S.Karnan to be personally present on 10th March 2017.


Here is Order dated 8th February 2017 passed by the Supreme Court :

“IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
SUO MOTU CONMT.PET.(C)NO.1 OF 2017

IN RE : HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.S. KARNAN

O R D E R

1. Issue notice to Shri Justice C.S.Karnan, returnable on 13.02.2017.

2. The Registry is directed to ensure, that a copy of this order, and the letters taken note of while issuing notice, are furnished to Shri Justice C.S.Karnan, during the course of the day, through the Registrar General of the Calcutta High Court.

3. Shri Justice C.S.Karnan, shall forthwith refrain from handling any judicial or administrative work, as may have been assigned to him, in furtherance of the office held by him. He is also directed to return, all judicial and administrative files in his possession, to the Registrar General of the High Court immediately.

4. Shri Justice C.S.Karnan shall remain present in Court in person, on the next date of hearing, to show cause.

5. The learned Attorney General has assisted us during the 2 course of hearing, today. We request him to assist us, during the course of further proceedings in the matter.

 .........................CJI. (JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR) .........................J.
(DIPAK MISRA) ..........................J.
(J.CHELAMESWAR) ..........................J.
(RANJAN GOGOI) ..........................J.
(MADAN B.LOKUR) ..........................J.
(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ..........................J.
(KURIAN JOSEPH) …......................J.

NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 8, 2017.”




Here is Order dated 13th February 2017 passed by the Supreme Court :

“IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION(C) NO.1 OF 2017

In Re: Sri Justice C.S. Karnan

O R D E R

Sri Justice C.S. Karnan has been duly served, in terms of the motion Bench order dated 08.02.2017. A communication dated 10.02.2017 addressed by Sri Justice C.S. Karnan to the Secretary General of this Court has been received in the Registry of this Court. Every page of the above communication bears his signatures. The aforesaid letter of Sri Justice C.S. Karnan is taken on record.

2. Despite due notice, Shri Justice C.S. Karnan has not appeared. No one has been authorised by Sri Justice C.S. Karnan to represent him today. In any case, no one having a power of attorney, has represented him today. We are not aware of the reason(s) for his non-appearance. It is therefore, that we refrain from proceeding with the matter as of now.

3. Post for hearing on 10.03.2017 at 10.30 a.m. Sri Justice C.S. Karnan is directed to be present in Court in person, on the next date of hearing. We also hereby direct, that the interim order passed in this matter on 08.02.2017, shall continue till further orders.

4. It is necessary to notice, that certain counsel, appeared on their own. We enquired from them, whether they were duly authorised by Sri Justice C.S. Karnan, and were in possession of a power of attorney to represent him. They had no such 2 authorization. These learned counsel submitted, that they proposed to file impleadment application on behalf of certain organization. The oral prayer for impleadment is rejected.

5. Since contempt proceedings are a matter strictly between the Court and the alleged contemnor, anyone who enters appearance and disrupts the proceedings of this case in future, should understand that he/she can be proceeded against, in consonance with law. All that we need to say is, that no one should appear in this matter, without due consent and authorization.

6. The Registry shall communicate the instant order to Sri Justice C.S. Karnan, in the same manner as he was communicated the previous order.

….....................CJI [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR] …......................J.
[DIPAK MISRA] …......................J.
[J. CHELAMESWAR] …......................J.
[RANJAN GOGOI] …......................J.
[MADAN B. LOKUR] …......................J.
(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ..........................J.
(KURIAN JOSEPH) …......................J.

NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 13, 2017.”