Sunday, July 21, 2013

Tainted politicians can no more contest elections in India

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by landmark judgment of 10th July 2013 declared Section 8(4) of Representation of People Act to be unconstitutional. Earlier, the politicians could continue as MPs or MLAs even on conviction, simply by filing appeal. Now, such protection has been taken away. Now, if an MP or MLA is convicted by a court for specified offences, then he will automatically cease to be MP / MLA. Further, the Supreme court interpreting Section 62(5) held that a person in prison or in lawful custody of police is not entitled to vote and hence is not entitled to even contest the election for MP/MLA. 


Sunil Goel, advocate 
B.Sc. L.Lb L.Lm


Supreme Court of India permits Mumbai Dance bars to reopen

Supreme Court of India permits Mumbai Dance bars to reopen

On 17th July 2013, a Bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by CJI Altamas Kabir passed yet another important judgment in the case of “State of Maharashtra & others vs Indian Hotel & Restaurants Association & others”. The Supreme Court quashed the ban imposed about 7 years ago by Maharashtra govt. on the functioning of Dance bars in Mumbai. The Govt of Maharashtra had in 2005 brought in an amendment in the Bombay Police Act which was then challenged in the High court by an association representing restaurants and bars. The High Court gave relief to the dance bar owners but the Govt had challenged High Court’s verdict in the Supreme Court.

The dance bar owners will now have to apply for a license to the government before reopening.



Sunil Goel 
advocate 
B.Sc. L.Lb L.Lm

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BY 2:1 MAJORITY QUASHES NATIONAL ELIGIBILITY CUM ENTRANCE TEST (NEET) for admission TO MEDICAL COLLEGES

Dear Friends,

A three-judge bench of  Supreme Court of India headed by CJI Justice Altamas Kabir (who retires on 19th July 2013) has pronounced an important judgment on 18th July 2013.  The Medical council of India had prescribed National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission in MBBS, BDS and post-graduate medical courses for improvement in standards of medical education and medical students. The NEET is a single entrance-cum-eligibility-test for admission in all medical colleges in India. The three-judge bench by a 2:1 majority (CJI Altamas Kabir and Justice Vikramajit Sen) quashed the NEET and held that the Medical Council of India had no powers to conduct single entrance examination.

However, the 3rd judge Justice A.R.Dave gave separate dissenting judgment and held that the notification prescribing NEET for admission to medical colleges is not only legal but is a boon for students aspiring to join medical profession. He inter-alia observed : “In my  opinion,  introduction  of  the NEET would ensure more transparency and less hardship to the  student  eager to join the medical profession.  Let us see the consequence,  if the apex bodies of medical profession are not permitted to conduct the  NEET.  A student, who is good at studies  and  is  keen  to  join  the  medical profession, will have to visit  several  different  States  to appear at different examinations held by different medical colleges or institutes so as to ensure that he gets admission  somewhere.   If  he appears only in one examination conducted by a  particular  University  in a particular State and if he fails there,  he  would  not  stand  a chance to get medical education at any other  place.   The  NEET  will facilitate all students desirous of  joining  the  medical  profession because the students will have to appear only at one  examination  and on the basis of the result of the NEET, if he is  found  suitable,  he would be in a position to get admission somewhere in the  country  and  he can have the medical education  if  he  is  inclined  to  go  to  a  different place.  Incidentally, I may state here that  learned  senior counsel Mr. Gupta had informed the Court that some  medical  colleges  who are more in a profiteering business rather than in the noble  work  of imparting medical education, take huge amount by way of donation or capitation fees and give admission to  undeserving  or  weak  students under one pretext or the other.   He had also  given  an  instance  to support the serious allegation made by him on the  subject.   If  only  one examination in the country is conducted and admissions  are  given on the basis of the result of the said  examination,  in  my  opinion, unscrupulous and money minded businessmen operating in  the  field  of  education would be constrained to stop their corrupt practices and  it would help a lot, not only to the deserving students but also  to  the nation in bringing down the level of corruption”.

The majority judgment will help Private Colleges who sell MBBS seats on caption. It is understood that Govt. is planning to refer this judgment to a Constitution Bench.


Sunil Goel advocate B.Sc. L.Lb L.Lm